Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association ; : 64-70, 2010.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-225010

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The diagnosis and assessment of personality disorders are crucial for research, as well as for clinical practice. The Structured Interview for the DSM-IV Personality (SIDP-IV) is a structured diagnostic interview for DSM-IV personality disorders (PD). This study aimed to develop the Korean version of the SIDP-IV and to test its inter-rater reliability. METHODS: A panel consisting of 7 psychiatrists translated the SIDP-IV into Korean. Six psychiatrists and 1 psychiatric nurse, all trained to apply the SIPD-IV, interviewed 70 inpatients (male, 30;female, 40) using this translation, two joint-examiners per patient interview. We used kappa coefficients to test diagnosis agreement, the Pearson correlation coefficient to test K-SIDP-IV total score agreement, and percent agreement to test the agreement on the number of DSM-IV criteria met. RESULTS: The kappa coefficients for most of the PDs, such as paranoid, borderline, histrionic, narcissistic, avoidant, dependent, and obsessive-compulsive, were excellent (> or =0.80). Moreover, the kappa coefficients for schizoid and antisocial PD were acceptable (k=0.66). The Pearson correlation coefficient for the K-SIDP-IV total scores were high for all personality disorders (r=0.91-0.97). Percent agreement regarding the number of DSM-IV criteria met varied from 92.9% to 100%. CONCLUSION: The Korean version of the SIDP-IV is a reliable instrument for the assessment and diagnosis of personality disorders.


Subject(s)
Humans , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Inpatients , Personality Disorders , Psychiatry
2.
Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association ; : 453-460, 2007.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-25248

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Since the publication of Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Major depressive Disorder (KMAP-MD) in 2002, there has been a substantial need for a revision due to rapid progress in the pharmacological management for depressive disorder. We revised KMAP-MD to Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Depressive Disorder (KMAP-DD) in 2006. This paper is one of the following 4 papers consisting of Korean pharmacological algorithm for depressive disorder. METHODS: The questionnaire consisted of 4 parts; initial treatment of 1) non-psychotic depressive disorder, 2) psychotic depressive disorder, 3) treatment strategy for clinical subtypes and drug choice considering adverse effects, and 4) treatment for depressive disorder in women. It was composed of 22 questions, and each question had 54 sub-items. The questionnaire was completed by the review committee consisting of 101 experienced Korean psychiatrists. We classified the expert opinion to 3 categories (the first-line, the second-line, or the third-line). RESULTS: For non-psychotic major depression, regardless of the severity of an episode, the antidepressant (AD) monotherapy was the optimal first-line treatment. SSRI, venlafaxine, and mirtazapine were the 1st-line AD. In case of a partial or no response to initial strategy, adding another AD was recommended. For psychotic major depression, combination of an AD and an atypical antipsychotic (AAP) was the treatment of choice. Among AAPs, quetiapine, risperidone, olanzapine were preferred. For non-responder to initial strategy, the next step was adding or changing AD before changing AAP. For women with premenstrual dysphoric syndrome or postpartum depression without psychotic features, AD monotherapty was a preferred strategy while for psychotic postpartum depression, combination of AD and AAP was recommended. Experts recommended various ADs according to adverse effect. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the medication strategies for depressive disorder are rapidly changing and reflect the recent studies and clinical experiences.


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Advisory Committees , Depression , Depression, Postpartum , Depressive Disorder , Depressive Disorder, Major , Expert Testimony , Psychiatry , Publications , Surveys and Questionnaires , Risperidone , Quetiapine Fumarate , Venlafaxine Hydrochloride
3.
Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association ; : 461-468, 2007.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-25247

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: There have been noticeable progresses in the pharmacological management of depressive disorders along with vigorous preclinical and clinical trials of newer antidepressant drugs during the last decade. Since the first development of Korean Medication Algorithm for Major Depressive Disorder (KMAP-MDD) in 2002, there has been a substantial need for the revision of this algorithm. We amended the KMAP-MDD to Korean Medication Algorithm for Depressive Disorders (KMAP-DD) in 2006 and included treatment strategies for other types of depressive disorders. This article is about the treatment of MDD without psychotic features in the KMAP-DD 2006. METHODS: Questionnaires were developed by the executive committee for KMAP-DD. The first part of this questionnaire is about the treatment strategies of MDD without psychotic features, minor depressive disorder and dysthymic disorder. Seven questions and 10 sub-items were prepared to investigate the experts' opinions about treatment of major depressive disorders without psychotic features. The expert review committee composed of 101 experienced Korean psychiatrists was asked to evaluate the medication strategies for various clinical situations of depressive disorders using a 9-point scale. The scale was slightly modified from the format developed by the RAND corporation. We classified the expert opinions into 3 categories (first-line, high second-line and low second-line) by the 95% confidence interval of response score and evaluated the consensus of opinions of Korean experts using Chi2-test. RESULTS: For patients with MDD without psychotic features, antidepressant monotherapy was the optimal first-line treat-ment strategy regardless of the severity of an episode. In case of no or partial response to antidepressant monotherapy for severe episode of MDD, combination treatment with another antidepressant drug or augmentation treatment with triiodothyronine or lithium was considered as the second-line treatment. Meanwhile, for mild-to-moderate episode of MDD without psychotic features, switching to another antidepressant as well as augmentation or combination treatment was also considered as the second-line treatment. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, venlafaxine, and mirtazapine were chosen as the 1st-line antidepressant drugs for MDD without psychotic features in Korea. CONCLUSION: The initial treatment strategy for patients with major depressive disorder without psychotic features is similar to that of the previous medication algorithm (KMAP-MDD). However, combination treatment with two antidepressant drugs and augmentation treatment strategies were considered at a relatively earlier step in this algorithm than in the previous version of Korean medication algorithm (KMAP-MDD) for the severe episode of major depressive disorder. The recent trials of newer antidepressant drugs and the preference of more active treatment strategy in up-to-date clinical psychiatry fields may have affected these changes in Korea.


Subject(s)
Humans , Advisory Committees , Antidepressive Agents , Consensus , Depressive Disorder , Depressive Disorder, Major , Dysthymic Disorder , Expert Testimony , Korea , Lithium , Psychiatry , Surveys and Questionnaires , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors , Triiodothyronine , Venlafaxine Hydrochloride
4.
Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association ; : 603-609, 2007.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-158643

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Since the publication of Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Major Depressive Disorder (KMAP-MD) in 2002, there has been a substantial need for a revision due to rapid progress in the pharmacological management of depressive disorder. We revised KMAP-MD 2002 and developed the Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Depressive Disorder (KMAP-DD) 2006. METHODS: We developed a questionniare for surveying the opinion of experts on pharmacotherapy of depressive disorder. The questionnaire consisted of 4 parts; 1) treatment of non-psychotic depressive disorder, 2) treatment of psychotic depressive disorder, 3) treatment according to clinical subtypes and drugs choice considering adverse effects, and 4) treatment of depressive disorder in women. The questionnaire was completed by the review committee consisting of 101 experienced Korean psychiatrists. It is composed of 22 questions, and each question includes 54 sub-items. We classified the expert opinion to 3 categories (the first-line, the second-line, or the third-line) by Chi2-test. RESULTS: For depressive disorder with psychotic features, most reviewers prefer the combination of antidepressant and atypical antipsychotics. Electroconvulsive therapy and the combination of antidepressant and typical antipsychotics were the second-line treatment. Among antidepressants, venlafaxine was the most preferred, and SSRI and mirtazapine followed. Among atypical antipsychotics, quetiapine, risperidone and olanzapine were the most preferred, in this order. In patients who have no response to the first-line treatment, many reviewers recommended switching to another antidepressant or adding another atypical antipsychotics. CONCLUSION: For severe depressive disorder with psychotic features, the combination of antidepressant and atypical antipsychotics was preferred for the first-line treatment. These results suggest that the medication strategies of depressive disorder are rapidly changing and reflects the recent studies and clinical experiences.


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Advisory Committees , Antidepressive Agents , Antipsychotic Agents , Depressive Disorder , Depressive Disorder, Major , Drug Therapy , Electroconvulsive Therapy , Expert Testimony , Psychiatry , Publications , Surveys and Questionnaires , Risperidone , Quetiapine Fumarate , Venlafaxine Hydrochloride
5.
Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association ; : 610-616, 2007.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-158642

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: In 2002, the Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Major depressive Disorder (KMAP-MD) was published, but there has been a need for a guideline about detailed issues of depressive disorder. We revised KMAP-MDD and reestablished Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Depressive Disorder (KMAP-DD) in 2006. METHODS: A questionnaire had been developed by the executive committee for KMAP-DD. The review committee consisted of 101 experienced psychiatrists. From the total of 22 questions in the questionnaire, 7 questions were evaluated for these subjects . We classified the expert opinions to 3 categories according to its confidence interval; first, second and third line. RESULTS: SSRI and venlafaxine were the first line antidepressants (AD) for atypical and melancholic depression. For dysthymic disorder and minor depressive disorder, SSRI was recommended as the first line medications. Only AD medications was a preferred initial strategy for treating premenstrual dysphoric disorder, mild to moderate and severe non-psychotic postpartum depression. In severe psychotic postpartum depression, combination therapy of AD and atypical antipsychotics was the treatment of choice. SSRI was preferred when considering sedation, anticholinergic and cardiovascular adverse effects. Also, experts recommended mirtazapine against gastrointestinal adverse effects and bupropion in avoiding sexual dysfunction. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that clinicians have to consider both clinical situations and drug adverse effects in the choice of antidepressant medications.


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Advisory Committees , Antidepressive Agents , Antipsychotic Agents , Bupropion , Depression , Depression, Postpartum , Depressive Disorder , Depressive Disorder, Major , Dysthymic Disorder , Expert Testimony , Psychiatry , Surveys and Questionnaires
6.
Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association ; : 708-713, 2005.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-146961

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of erectile dysfunction (ED) in a rural area of Korea and to examine the relationship between the prevalence and correlates of subjects. METHOD: This study was done as a part of the chronic disease survey of rural area by the Asan Foundation. Among 30 years or older population from Jung Eup, a rural area of Korea, 711 male subjects were sampled using a cluster probability sampling method. Trained interviewers visited and interviewed subjects aged 30 years or older with a structured interview. ED was categorized as 'none', 'mild', 'moderate', or 'severe' according to the ability to 'attain and/or maintain an erection satisfactory for sexual intercourse'. Response rate was 54.3% (N=386). RESULTS: The age weighted prevalence of ED was 27.2% (minimal 14.1%, moderate 7.6%, severe 5.5%). Prevalence and severity increased with age. Liver disease and underweight were significantly (p<0.05) associated with ED. Smoking seemed to be correlated with ED, but did not reach statistically significant level. CONCLUSION: ED was highly prevalent in the rural community of Korea. Medical, sociodemographic, and lifestyle variables associated with ED may alert physicians to patients at risk for ED and offer insight to its etiology.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Chronic Disease , Epidemiology , Erectile Dysfunction , Korea , Life Style , Liver Diseases , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Rural Population , Smoke , Smoking , Thinness
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL